Wed 4 Apr 2007
On Rhetorical Questions
Posted by Pasty under Rantish
No Comments
Rhetorical questions are great. I enjoy using them, especially as a verbal weapon to embarrass my enemies.
Quick linguaphile note: embarass in rooted in a Portuguese word relating to hanging via noose, and has nothing to do with baring one’s ass, no matter how much I wish it did.
They say that internet and cellular communications mediums are devolving the childrens’ writing skills, and the plethora of anecdotal evidence on MySpace or Xanga should be enough to make the firmest nay-sayer say yea. Yes, the grammar and spelling and mechanics are suffering, but I think the problem goes beyond a failure to express ideas clearly. I believe people (read: pseudo-literate a-holes) are losing their ability to come up with ideas that ought to be expressed – clearly or otherwise – in the first place.
Rhetorical questions, always an advanced technique, are being employed by those less than qualified for such power. You don’t give a semi-automatic weapon to a 9-year-old with Down’s Syndrome, and we should, likewise, restrict bloggers and PR goons/marketers from using rhetorics unless they pass some sort of Language Certification Test (exact qualifications and test questions TBA).
Definition note: In this context, by ‘bloggers’ I mean anyone who writes off-handed, ill-researched, un-edited text to the WWWeb, whether is comes via Blogger, WordPress, or the guise of credibility at CNet/Wired/etc.’s website. They may get paid to write their blogs, but there is a fine line betwixt being a professional and having professionalism.
I’ve been seeing a lot of rhetorical misuse lately in the form of rhetorical questions with glaring, non-rhetorical answers that confound the “obvious” expected answer. Examples? I’ve got a couple. (more…)