And lawyers wonder whey they get such bad reps…
A class action lawsuit was started a few years ago against Seagate, because they based their GB calculations on a factor of 1000 instead of 1024. So, a hard drive advertised as 100gb by Seagate would contain 100,000,000,000 bytes, rather than 107,374,182,400 had they based it off the actual size of a gigabyte. So, your 100 gigabyte hard drive is really only 931 gigabytes. A difference of around 7%.
It’s pretty shitty, and I don’t know how the hard drive manufacturers have gotten away with advertising their drives like this for so long (Seagate is not the only guilty party). As we start moving to larger sized drives, obviously the difference in the calculations becomes more apparent. Sure, nobody probably cared too much back when their hundred megabyte hard drive was really only 93mb. But now when your shiny new terabyte drive is coming up 70gb short in explorer, you wonder, wtf.
My problem is how obscene these settlements are. If you purchased a drive between 2001 and 2006 from an authorized reseller, if you can provide all the necessary documentation, you are eligible for a refund of 5%, excluding taxes and refunds. When I was at Best Buy, you could get an 80gb drive for about $30-40 after rebates. A 120gb drive for maybe $50-75. Even if you paid full price, you might have paid 100-200 for a typical hard drive. So if you can jump through the hoops, you might be able to claim $5-10 for this gross injustice.
The three lines in the settlement agreement that really get me are these:
“As part of the settlement, Seagate will make certain disclosures regarding the storage capacity of its retail hard drives.”
So big fucking deal. So what, now a drive will be advertised as 500gb*, and in tiny tiny print somewhere on the box that asterisk will be followed by a line saying that the size is based off of the 1000 calculation, and that your system may report differently depending on how it calculates a gigabyte.  Unless they are going to start calculating the size based on the correct calculation, this entire case was pointless.
“If the settlement is approved, plaintiff’s counsel will apply for an award of attorneys’ fees, expenses and incentive awards not to exceed $1,792,000, to be paid separately from and in addition to the benefits available to settlement class members.”
So all the people who are ACTUALLY affected by this might get enough to buy their lunch for a day, and the lawyers collect close to 2 million. Fantastic. Was there really any benefit to this entire proceeding, other than the layers getting paid? No, not really, because:
“Seagate has denied and continues to deny each and all of plaintiff’s claims, and denies that anyone has been harmed or deserves compensation.”
So great, Seagate doesn’t think they’ve done anything wrong, so obviously they haven’t learned anything here, like that maybe you shouldn’t use misleading packaging in order to push drives!